![]() |
| What is Article 359 of Indian constitution |
Article 359 of the Indian Constitution
Title: Suspension of the enforcement of the rights conferred by Part III during emergencies
🔷 Explanation of Article 359:
Article 359 empowers the President of India to suspend the right to approach any court to enforce Fundamental Rights (except Articles 20 and 21) during a National Emergency.
⚠️ Important: It does not suspend the rights themselves, only bars their enforcement in courts.
✅ Key Provisions:
| Clause | What it means |
|---|---|
| (1) | During a National Emergency, the President may issue an order stating that the right to move any court for enforcement of specified Fundamental Rights is suspended. |
| (2) | The suspension applies only to the rights mentioned in the Presidential Order, and only for the duration specified. |
| Exception | After the 44th Amendment (1978), Articles 20 and 21 (protection in respect of conviction & right to life and liberty) cannot be suspended under any circumstances. |
🟢 Key Points:
| Aspect | Details |
|---|---|
| Applicable During | Any type of National Emergency under Article 352 |
| Who Acts? | President of India, through a Presidential Order |
| What is Suspended? | Right to move court for enforcement of specified Fundamental Rights |
| What Remains Intact? | The Fundamental Rights themselves (they are not nullified) |
| Exceptions | Article 20 (Protection in criminal convictions) and Article 21 (Right to life and liberty) cannot be suspended |
| Scope | Can be made applicable to entire India or a part of it, and for all or some Fundamental Rights |
📌 Purpose of Article 359:
To allow the government more flexibility and freedom in implementing emergency measures without being restrained by litigation over Fundamental Rights.
📝 Example:
-
During the 1975 Emergency, a Presidential Order was issued suspending the right to approach courts to enforce Articles 14, 19, 21, and 22.
-
Post 44th Amendment, Articles 20 & 21 cannot be included in such an order.
-
⚖️ Judicial View:
-
S.R. Bommai Case (1994) and ADM Jabalpur Case (1976) examined the scope and misuse of this Article.
-
After public and legal criticism, the 44th Constitutional Amendment permanently protected Articles 20 and 21.


Follow Us