![]() |
What is Article 356 of Indian constitution |
Article 356 of the Indian Constitution
Title: Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in States
Also known as: President’s Rule
🔷 Explanation of Article 356:
Article 356 empowers the President of India to impose President’s Rule in a State if the State Government is unable to function according to the provisions of the Constitution.
This is invoked when there is a breakdown of constitutional machinery in a State.
✅ Key Provisions:
Clause | What it provides |
---|---|
(1) | If the President, on Governor’s report (or otherwise), is satisfied that a State government cannot be carried on in accordance with the Constitution, he may: |
-
Assume all or any functions of the State Government,
-
Declare that the Legislature of the State is suspended or dissolved,
-
Take other necessary steps. |
| (2) | The Proclamation must be approved by both Houses of Parliament within 2 months. |
| (3) | Once approved, President’s Rule continues for 6 months and can be extended, with approval, up to a maximum of 3 years (subject to conditions). |
🛑 Conditions for Extension Beyond 1 Year:
-
A National Emergency (Article 352) must be in operation, or
-
Election Commission must certify that elections in the State cannot be held.
🟢 Key Points:
Aspect | Details |
---|---|
Who Recommends? | Usually the Governor of the State |
Who Declares? | President of India |
Approval Needed | Must be approved by Parliament within 2 months |
Initial Duration | 6 months |
Maximum Duration | 3 years, with Parliament's approval every 6 months |
Effect | State Government is dismissed, Assembly dissolved or suspended, and Union Government governs through the Governor |
📝 Historical Usage:
State | Occasion |
---|---|
Punjab (1987–1992) | Militancy and constitutional failure |
Uttarakhand (2016) | Political crisis and alleged breakdown of law |
Maharashtra (1980) | Breakdown in governance |
Arunachal Pradesh (2016) | Political instability |
⚖️ Judicial Check:
-
The Supreme Court in S.R. Bommai v. Union of India (1994) ruled:
-
President’s Rule is subject to judicial review.
-
Centre cannot misuse Article 356 for political reasons.
-
Parliament's approval is not absolute protection.
-
Here is a comparison chart between Article 355 and Article 356 of the Indian Constitution:
🗂️ Comparison Chart: Article 355 vs Article 356
Aspect | Article 355 | Article 356 |
---|---|---|
Title | Duty of the Union to protect States against external aggression and internal disturbance | Provisions in case of failure of constitutional machinery in States |
Type | Directive Duty | Emergency Provision |
Purpose | To ensure national integrity, internal peace, and constitutional functioning in States | To impose President’s Rule when State government fails constitutionally |
Who Acts? | Union Government (Centre) | President of India, based on Governor’s report or otherwise |
Triggering Situation | - External aggression - Internal disturbance - Need to ensure constitutional governance | Breakdown of State machinery or State failing to function as per Constitution |
Legal Nature | Moral and constitutional responsibility | Enforceable provision — action-oriented |
Effect | Forms the basis or justification for Union action in States | Leads to dismissal of State Government, State Assembly suspended/dissolved, Union takes control |
Duration | Permanent duty of Union, always applicable | Initial period: 6 months Max extension: 3 years (with conditions) |
Judicial Review? | Not directly challengeable | Yes, subject to judicial review (e.g., S.R. Bommai case) |
Example | Centre sending forces to stop riots, citing internal disturbance | Uttarakhand 2016 – President's Rule imposed due to political crisis |
📝 Summary:
-
🛡️ Article 355 = A constitutional duty of the Union to protect and maintain order in States.
-
🛑 Article 356 = A powerful emergency tool invoked when a State fails to operate as per the Constitution.
Follow Us